Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10609/139398
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Aleksandra-
dc.contributor.authorPalmen, Rachel-
dc.contributor.authorReidl, Sybille-
dc.contributor.authorBarnard, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorBeranek, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorDainty, Andrew R.J.-
dc.contributor.authorHassan, Tarek M.-
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC)-
dc.contributor.otherInternet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3)-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T20:30:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-14T20:30:16Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-12-
dc.identifier.citationAleksandra Thomson, Rachel Palmén, Sybille Reidl, Sarah Barnard, Sarah Beranek, Andrew R. J Dainty & Tarek M. Hassan (2022) Fostering collaborative approaches to gender equality interventions in higher education and research: the case of transnational and multi-institutional communities of practice, Journal of Gender Studies, 31:1, 36-54, DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2021.1935804-
dc.identifier.issn0958-9236MIAR
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10609/139398-
dc.description.abstractHigher education and research and innovation in Europe continue to suffer from an indefensible waste of female talent and gender inequality. The European Commission recommends that these organizations adopt gender equality plans (GEPs) and other initiatives for institutional change. However, the levels of readiness, expertise, and experience with such interventions are wide-ranging across institutions and member states, thus collaborative approaches might be particularly valuable. Drawing on the experiences of transnational and multi-institutional communities of practice (CoPs) for gender equality (GE), we illuminate how the CoP approach supported change agents, who leveraged CoP membership to respond to challenges in promoting GE initiatives. Being part of collaborative, co-designed CoPs for learning, knowledge sharing, and institutional change provided external support to the change agents' activism and allowed them to build legitimacy around GE work. CoP members leveraged this support through learning opportunities, knowledge transfer, sharing practice, political support, and solidarity from the CoP stakeholders. Findings also show that when CoPs were transnational, multi-institutional, and interdisciplinary, their heterogeneity did raise some challenges in relation to the divergence of members' contexts and geopolitical idiosyncrasies and that this should be considered when designing CoPs which transcend national and institutional boundaries.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherJournal of Gender Studies-
dc.relation.ispartofseries31;1-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/-
dc.subjectcommunities of practiceen
dc.subjectgender equality initiativesen
dc.subjectgender equality plansen
dc.subjecthigher educationen
dc.subjectresearch and innovationen
dc.subjectcollaborative approachesen
dc.subjectinstitutional changeen
dc.titleFostering collaborative approaches to gender equality interventions in higher education and research: the case of transnational and multi-institutional communities of practice-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09589236.2021.1935804-
dc.gir.idAR/0000008973-
Aparece en las colecciones: Articles cientÍfics

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Fostering collaborative approaches to gender equality interventions in higher education and research.pdf760,66 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir