Institutional Repository
Institutional Repository Institutional Repository Login  Institutional Repository  
  • UOC Library |
  •  |
  •  |

Home >
Research >
Social sciences >
Education >
E-learning >
UOC journals >
RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal >
2011, vol. 8, n. 2 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10609/13526
Title: Dudas y conflictos en torno a los programas de grado doble
Authors: Knight, Jane
Keywords: double degree programs
joint degree program
consecutive degree program
quality assurance
qualifications recognition
internationalization
Issue Date: 12-Jul-2011
Publisher: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya
Type: Article
Citation: Knight, Jane (2011). "Dudas y conflictos en torno a los programas de grado doble". RUSC. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 2011, Vol. 8, núm 2
Abstract: The number and types of international joint, double and consecutive degree programs have sky-rocketed in the last five years, demonstrating that they clearly have a role in the current landscape of higher education. For many academics and policy makers, double and joint degree programs are welcomed as a natural extension of exchange and mobility programs. For others, they are perceived as a troublesome development leading to double counting of academic work and the thin edge of academic fraud. A broad range of reactions exist due to the diversity of program models; the involvement of new (bona fide and rogue) and traditional providers; the uncertainty related to quality assurance and qualifications recognition; and finally, the ethics involved in deciding what academic workload or new competencies are required for the granting of joint, double, multiple or consecutive degrees. This article aims to clarify the confusion about the differences between a joint, a double and a consecutive degree program by providing a conceptual framework of definitions. It provides highlights from recent research surveys and studies, and looks at new developments and innovations in establishing these types of collaborative programs. Finally, it examines the factors that challenge the operationalization of the programs and explores those issues that raise doubts and dilemmas and require further debate and analysis.
Description: Peer reviewed
Language: Spanish
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10609/13526
Appears in Collections:2011, vol. 8, n. 2

Scimago Journal Rank:

Add This:

RefWorks:

Ratings:
  0 (0 valuations)


Resource

http://rusc.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v8n2-knight/v8n2-knight-esp

Author names in Twitter


Author names in FriendFeed



Recommend this item

SFX Query

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

Items in Repository e are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

The library replies
A product of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya Virtual Library