Social sciences >
Information and Knowledge Society >
Conference lectures >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||The tension between academic knowledge production and online peer production|
|Autor: ||Aibar Puentes, Eduard|
|Keywords: ||peer production|
|Issue Date: ||2012|
|Citación: ||Aibar, E. (2012). "The tension between academic knowledge production and online peer production". 4S/EASST Joint Conference 2012 Social Studies of Science and Technology, 17-20 octubre.|
|Abstract: ||Online mass collaboration projects, such as Wikipedia and those designed for developing open source software programs, are remarkable examples of hybrid spaces where knowledge and information are co-produced by a wide variety of social actors. They share many features with traditional scientific practices: peer review mechanisms, a commitment for open publication of results, a meritocratic culture, etc. Nevertheless, there are also important differences: in online peer production peer review is often open and post-publication; the distinction between experts and lay people does not play a priori a crucial role ¿ amateur contributions are welcome; not only results are published but the process of production ¿ and thus intermediate results and procedures - is also open, etc. Though the present movement towards open science and open research pleads for importing some of these features to the realm of science and academia, it is not clear whether both cultures and ways of knowledge production are fully compatible.
We try to address this issue through an empirical study on university lecturers¿ uses and perceptions of Wikipedia. The ¿free collaborative encyclopedia¿ is known to be one of the widest used resources by university students, but there are no systematic studies on how lectures and researchers use and perceive this source of information - though they seem to share a more skeptical view. We will present the preliminary results of a set on interviews to professors in different departments of our own university, as a first qualitative stage of a longer on-going research project.|
|Appears in Collections:||Conference lectures|
Author names in FriendFeed
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in Repository e are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.