|
Home >
Research >
Social sciences >
Information and Knowledge Society >
Conference lectures >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10609/17441
|
| Title: | The CerdàPlan for the Extension of Barcelona: A Constructivist Analysis of a Town-planning Controversy |
| Authors: | Aibar Puentes, Eduard |
| Keywords: | Town planning |
| Issue Date: | 2012 |
| Type: | Conference lecture |
| Citation: | Aibar, E. (2012). "The CerdàPlan for the Extension of Barcelona: A Constructivist Analysis of a Town-planning Controversy". A: Technology, the Arts and Industrial Culture. 39th Annual meeting of the International Committee for the History of Technology, 10-14 de juliol. |
| Abstract: | This work applies a social constructivist perspective to the analysis of a town-planning innovation. In particular the social construction of technology framework (SCOT), proposed by Trevor Pinch and Wiebe Bijker, is used to explain the dynamics of the design and implementation processes of a huge town-planning project. The so-called Cerdà Plan for the extension of Barcelona, designed by a civil engineer, Ildefons Cerdà (1815-1876), was launched in the 1860s and gave this city one of its most characteristic features, affecting some present districts of Barcelona. For different reasons it can be considered an extraordinary case in town-planning history, where technical, professional, political, and economical forces were quite explicitly struggling to influence the final project. The author analyzes the intense controversy that developed around the extension plan and the three technological frames involved ¿ the controversy was particularly heated from 1854 to 1860 although most of the issues at stake were still being debated at the beginning of the XX century. Town planning is understood here as a form of technology and the city as a kind of artifact. Social relevant groups are identified and described and some processes of interpretative flexibility around specific features of the plan are also analyzed. The sociohistorical account is used to illustrate a specific concept of power, to be used in a politics of technology. |
| Description: | Peer-reviewed |
| Language: | eng |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10609/17441 |
| Appears in Collections: | Conference lectures
|
Author names in FriendFeed
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in Repository e are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|