Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10609/92794
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorCalvet-Mir, Laura -
dc.contributor.authorCorbera, Esteve-
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Adrian-
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Janet A.-
dc.contributor.authorGross Camp, Nicole D.-
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB)-
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of East Anglia-
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Edinburgh-
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Oberta de Catalunya. Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3)-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T13:44:35Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-02T13:44:35Z-
dc.date.issued2015-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationCalvet-Mir, L., Corbera, E., Martin, A., Fisher, J. & Gross-Camp, N. (2015). Payments for ecosystem services in the tropics: a closer look at effectiveness and equity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14(), 150-162. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.001-
dc.identifier.issn1877-3435MIAR
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10609/92794-
dc.description.abstractWe undertake a review of academic literature that examines the effectiveness and equity-related performance of PES initiatives targeting biodiversity conservation in tropical and sub-tropical countries. We investigate the key features of such analyses as regards their analytical and methodological approach and we identify emerging lessons from PES practice, leading to a new suggested research agenda. Our results indicate that analyses of PES effectiveness have to date focused on either ecosystem service provision or habitat proxies, with only half of them making explicit assessment of additionality and most describing that payments have been beneficial for land cover and biodiversity. Studies evaluating the impact of PES on livelihoods suggest more negative outcomes, with an uneven treatment of the procedural and distributive considerations of scheme design and payment distribution, and a large heterogeneity of evaluative frameworks. We propose an agenda for future PES research based on the emerging interest in assessing environmental outcomes more rigorously and documenting social impacts in a more comparative and contextually situated form.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability-
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2015, 14()-
dc.relation.urihttps://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/54062/2/coSust_PESreview.pdf-
dc.rights(c) Author/s & (c) Journal-
dc.subjectpayment for ecosystem servicesen
dc.subjectpagament de serveis ecosistèmicsca
dc.subjectpago por servicios ecosistémicoses
dc.subjectbiodiversity conservationen
dc.subjectbonservación de la biodiversidades
dc.subjectconservació de la biodiversitatca
dc.subject.lcshBiological diversityen
dc.titlePayments for ecosystem services in the tropics: a closer look at effectiveness and equity-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/review-
dc.subject.lemacBiodiversitatca
dc.subject.lcshesBiodiversidades
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.001-
Aparece en las colecciones: Articles
Articles cientÍfics

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
payments.pdf633,49 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Comparte:
Exporta:
Consulta las estadísticas

Los ítems del Repositorio están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.