Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

http://hdl.handle.net/10609/93216
Title: Los jueces y la ciencia del derecho en el nuevo orden constitucional, una comparación entre el mundo premoderno y la posmodernidad
Other Titles: Judges and legal science in the new constitutional order, a comparison between the premodern and postmodern world
Author: Vial Dumas, Manuel José  
Others: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC)
Keywords: constitutional judge
constitutionalisation of law
legal pluralism
sources of law
neo-constitutionalism
Issue Date: 23-Apr-2018
Publisher: Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional
Citation: Vial-Dumas, M. (2018). Los jueces y la ciencia del derecho en el nuevo orden constitucional, una comparación entre el mundo premoderno y la posmodernidad. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, (112), 177-204. doi: 10.18042/cepc/redc.112.06
Also see: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/redc.112.06
Abstract: Among other contemporary phenomena, legal new-pluralism and the constitutionalisation of law have placed the civil law judge in a new role. This position is very different from that proposed by the Enlightenment but is broadly similar to the model of premodern judge. Legal pluralism turns the judge an active participant in the configuration of the solutions provided by the law to each specific case. The phenomenon of constitutionalisation of law generates a two-dimensional legal reality composed, on the one hand, by the state law and, on the other hand, by a universal law (in the manner of medieval ius commune). This second dimension, grounded on the doctrine and jurisprudence, is able to determine the content and to provide legitimacy to the first one.
Language: Spanish
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10609/93216
ISSN: 0211-5743MIAR

1989-0648MIAR
Appears in Collections:Articles
Articles

Share:
Export:
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.