Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10609/143707
Title: | Avaluació Ex-Ante i Ex-Post de la recerca: Aproximacions per a analitzar la validesa de dues eines d'avaluació de la recerca |
Author: | Solans Domènech, Maria Teresa |
Director: | Aymerich, Marta ![]() |
Abstract: | The aim of this thesis was to validate research evaluation methodologies that appear in two different phases of the research process: one ex-ante and one ex-post. Analyzing the validity of research evaluation approaches can provide valuable information for decision-making. Some challenges should be taken into account that may limit the methodology's validity: the experience and competence of the experts used in the evaluation process; the context in which the evaluation process takes place ; the needs of the stakeholders interested in the procedure or its outcomes; a clear definition of the concepts used in the evaluation; identification of barriers and facilitators of a given outcome; and finally, ensuring data quality. In conclusion, analyzing the validity of research evaluation procedures is a forward-looking approach that helps to understand and improve the evaluation process and its credibility, and therefore the usefulness of the evaluations. |
Keywords: | grant peer review blinding questionnaires research impact assessment validity |
Document type: | info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
Version: | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Issue Date: | 15-Jan-2021 |
Publication license: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ ![]() |
Appears in Collections: | Tesis doctorals |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tesi _MaiteSolans.pdf | Solans_Domènech_tesi | 2,03 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Share:
![]( /image/googleScholar.png)
![](/image/microsoftAcademic.png)
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License