Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10609/89665
Title: | Comparative analysis of legal ontologies, a literature review |
Author: | Torres Jiménez, Carlos Miguel |
Tutor: | Isern, David ![]() |
Others: | Ventura, Carles ![]() |
Abstract: | The purpose of this research work is to provide a reference review for people interested in the design and creation of ontologies in the field of law. The reader is put in context within ontologies in general, and legal ontologies in particular, standards and methodologies are reviewed. Then, the subject is listed, listing the most important standards for legal ontologies, different legal systems that exist, most important foundational ontologies, and analyzing the most recent domain ontologies created in various legal systems throughout the world. Finally, we come to the conclusion that historical evolution has tended to divide the same domain into several ontologies, that there is no single correct methodology, that one can be used, or create a new one, or take several ideas from various methodologies. And finally, the importance of the methodology of Hoekstra and its legal ontology LKIF and the separation between norm and situation. |
Keywords: | legal ontology legal knowledge modelling legal semantic web |
Document type: | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
Issue Date: | 2-Jan-2019 |
Publication license: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ ![]() |
Appears in Collections: | Bachelor thesis, research projects, etc. |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
cmtorresVideo0119.mp4 | Vídeo de presentació del treball final de recerca | 347,98 MB | MP4 | View/Open |
cmtorresTFG0119memory.pdf | Memory of TFG | 2,24 MB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
cmtorresTFG0119presentación.pdf | Presentación en PDF del TFG | 512,57 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Share:


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License