Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10609/146747
Título : | Inclusive conservation and the post-2020 global biodiversity framework: tensions and prospects |
Autoría: | M. Raymond, Christopher Cebrián-Piqueras, Miguel Ángel Andersson, Erik Andrade, Riley Arroyo Schnell, Alberto Battioni Romanelli, Barbara Filyushkina, Anna Goodson, Devin Lo, Veronica Kuiper, Jan J. Keller, Rose Johnson, Dana N. Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana Sellberg, My M. Salcido, Evan Oteros-Rozas, Elisa Metzger, Marc March, Hug López-Rodríguez, María D. Verburg, Peter Wiedermann, Magdalena M. |
Otros: | University of Helsinki University of Göttingen Stockholm University University of Florida University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Norwegian Institute for Nature Research University of British Columbia Babeş-Bolyai University Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) University of Edinburgh Lund University |
Citación : | Raymond, C., Cebrián-Piqueras, M.A., Andersson, E., Andrade, R., Arroyo Schnell, A., Battioni Romanelli, B., Filyushkina, A., Goodson, D.J., Horcea Milcu, A., Johnson, D., Keller, R., Kuiper, J.J., Lo, V.B., López-Rodríguez, M.D., March, H., Metzger, M.J., Oteros Rozas, E., Salcido, E., Sellberg, M., Stewart, W., Ruiz Mallen, I., Plieninger, T., van Riper, C.J., Verburg, P.H. & Wiedermann, M.M. (2022). Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects. One Earth, 5(3), 252-264. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008 |
Resumen : | The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a “relational turn” in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although “inclusivity” is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational turn in biodiversity conservation. Drawing on global case examples applying multiple methods of inclusive conservation, we then demonstrate that, by actively engaging in the interdependent phases of recognizing hybridity, enabling conditions for reflexivity and partnership building, tensions can not only be acknowledged but softened and, in some cases, reframed when managing for biodiversity, equity, and justice goals. The results can improve stakeholder engagement in protected area management, ultimately supporting better implementation of global biodiversity targets. |
Palabras clave : | conservación inclusiva conservación de la biodiversidad equidad valoración plural valores servicios ecosistemicos gestión de espacios protegidos |
DOI: | https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.02.008 |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Versión del documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Fecha de publicación : | 18-mar-2022 |
Licencia de publicación: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Articles Articles cientÍfics |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PIIS2590332222000938.pdf | Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework: Tensions and prospects | 4,31 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Comparte:
Los ítems del Repositorio están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.