Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10609/147886
Título : | The Street Lamp Paradox: Analysing Students’ Evaluation of Teaching through Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches |
Autoría: | Ghislandi, Patrizia Maria Margherita Raffaghelli, Juliana Elisa Sangrà, Albert Ritella, Giuseppe |
Otros: | University of Trento Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Estudis de Psicologia i Ciències de l'Educació University of Helsinki |
Citación : | Ghislandi, P., Raffaghelli, J.E., Sangrà, A. & Ritella, G. (2020). The Street Lamp Paradox: Analysing Students' Evaluation of Teaching through Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies, (21), 65-85. doi: 10.7358/ecps-2020-021-ghis |
Resumen : | This paper presents a study about Students Evaluation of Teaching (SET). Student surveys delivered at the end of the academic course is an approach currently applied in all Italian university courses. However, the quality of teaching is a multi-layered phenomenon whose evaluation might require additional methods. In this study, concerning a course offered during the academic year 2016/2017, we propose the qualitative analysis of students’ final essays, which includes the students’ opinion about teaching quality. The qualitative evaluation of teaching is then compared with the results of the standard SET survey. 48 students filled in the survey, while 47 delivered their final essay (a corpus of about 650 text pages). Our study shows that while the standard survey provides an overall picture useful at institutional level for Quality Assurance (QA), the qualitative approach captures an accurate account of students’ reactions, sensitive to the pedagogical approach adopted. This provides additional information on the students’ perspectives regarding the specific features of the course. Our case study suggests that the integration of traditional SET survey with qualitative teaching evaluation approaches, at least for innovative courses based on socio-constructivist learning, might provide information, overlooked in the Italian SET survey, that is useful for Quality Enhancement (QE) of teaching. |
Palabras clave : | evaluación cualitativa de la docencia; seguro de calidad mejora de la calidad aprendizaje socioconstructivista; evaluación de la docencia por parte de los estudiantes |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2020-021-ghis |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Versión del documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Fecha de publicación : | 2-jun-2020 |
Licencia de publicación: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Articles Articles cientÍfics |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1934-7886-1-PB.pdf | 425,13 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Comparte:
Los ítems del Repositorio están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.