Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10609/149005
Título : | Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views |
Autoría: | Fàbregues, Sergi Escalante, Elsa Molina Azorin, José Francisco Hong, Quan Nha Verd, Joan M. |
Citación : | Fàbregues S. [Sergi]. Escalante-Barrios, E. [Elsa]. Molina-Azorin J. [José Francisco]. Hong, Q. [Quan Nha]. Verd J. [Joan Miquel]. (2021) Taking a critical stance towards mixed methods research: A cross-disciplinary qualitative secondary analysis of researchers’ views. PLoS ONE 16(7): e0252014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0252014 |
Resumen : | Recent growth and institutionalization in the field of mixed methods research has provided fertile ground for a wide range of thoughtful criticism of how this research approach has been developed and conceptualized by some members of the mixed methods community. This criticism reflects the increasing maturity of the field as well as the different theoretical perspectives and methodological practices of researchers in different disciplines. While debates addressing these criticisms are likely to lead to valuable insights, no empirical stud- ies have been carried out to date that have investigated researchers’ critical views on the development and conceptualization of mixed methods research. This study examines the criticisms of the mixed methods field raised by a cross-national sample of researchers in education, nursing, psychology, and sociology. We carried out a secondary analysis of semi-structured interviews with 42 researchers and identified 11 different criticisms, which we classified in four domains: essence of mixed methods, philosophy, procedures, and poli- tics. The criticisms related to the procedures domain were equally distributed among the four disciplines, while those related to the essence, philosophy and politics domains were more common among sociologists. Based on our findings, we argue that the divergence of views on foundational issues in this field reflects researchers’ affiliation to different commu- nities of practice, each having its own principles, values, and interests. We suggest that a greater awareness of this divergence of perspectives could help researchers establish effective collaboration and anticipate potential challenges when working with researchers having different methodological approaches. |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0252014 |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Versión del documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Fecha de publicación : | 9-jul-2021 |
Licencia de publicación: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Articles Articles cientÍfics |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fabregues_Taking_PloOn.pdf | 676,79 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Comparte:
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons