Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10609/150658
Título : Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance
Autoría: Markevych, Iana  
Schoierer, Julia
Hartig, Terry  
Chudnovsky, Alexandra  
Hystad, Perry  
Dzhambov, Angel  
de Vries, Sjerp  
Triguero-Mas, Margarita  
Brauer, Michael
Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark  
Lupp, Gerd  
Richardson, Elizabeth A.
Astell-Burt, Thomas
Dimitrova, Donka  
Feng, Xiaoqi
Sadeh, Maya
Standl, Marie  
Heinrich, Joachim  
Fuertes, Elaine  
Citación : Markevych, I. [Iana], Schoierer, J. [Julia], Hartig, T. [Terry], Chudnovsky, A. [Alexandra], Hystad, P. [Perry], Dzhambov, A. M. [Angel M.], ... & Fuertes, E. [Elaine] (2017). Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental research, 158, 301-317. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028
Resumen : Background In a rapidly urbanizing world, many people have little contact with natural environments, which may affect health and well-being. Existing reviews generally conclude that residential greenspace is beneficial to health. However, the processes generating these benefits and how they can be best promoted remain unclear. Objectives During an Expert Workshop held in September 2016, the evidence linking greenspace and health was reviewed from a transdisciplinary standpoint, with a particular focus on potential underlying biopsychosocial pathways and how these can be explored and organized to support policy-relevant population health research. Discussions Potential pathways linking greenspace to health are here presented in three domains, which emphasize three general functions of greenspace: reducing harm (e.g. reducing exposure to air pollution, noise and heat), restoring capacities (e.g. attention restoration and physiological stress recovery) and building capacities (e.g. encouraging physical activity and facilitating social cohesion). Interrelations between among the three domains are also noted. Among several recommendations, future studies should: use greenspace and behavioural measures that are relevant to hypothesized pathways; include assessment of presence, access and use of greenspace; use longitudinal, interventional and (quasi)experimental study designs to assess causation; and include low and middle income countries given their absence in the existing literature. Cultural, climatic, geographic and other contextual factors also need further consideration. Conclusions While the existing evidence affirms beneficial impacts of greenspace on health, much remains to be learned about the specific pathways and functional form of such relationships, and how these may vary by context, population groups and health outcomes. This Report provides guidance for further epidemiological research with the goal of creating new evidence upon which to develop policy recommendations.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.06.028
Tipo de documento: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Versión del documento: info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
Fecha de publicación : 2-oct-2017
Licencia de publicación: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/es/  
Aparece en las colecciones: Articles
Articles cientÍfics

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
Markevych_EnvironmResearch_Exploring.pdf1,47 MBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir
Comparte:
Exporta:
Consulta las estadísticas

Los ítems del Repositorio están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.