Empreu aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10609/93233
Registre complet de metadades
Camp DCValorLlengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Jonathan-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Tengfei-
dc.contributor.authorVilajosana, Xavier-
dc.contributor.authorWatteyne, Thomas-
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC)-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-15T11:37:27Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-15T11:37:27Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-15-
dc.identifier.citationMuñoz, J., Chang, T., Vilajosana, X. & Watteyne, T. (2018). Evaluation of IEEE802.15.4g for environmental observations. Sensors, 18(10). doi:10.3390/s18103468-
dc.identifier.issn1424-8220MIAR
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10609/93233-
dc.description.abstractIEEE802.15.4g is a low-power wireless standard initially designed for Smart Utility Networks, i.e., for connecting smart meters. IEEE802.15.4g operates at sub-GHz frequencies to offer 2.3× longer communication range compared to its 2.4 GHz counterpart. Although the standard offers 3 PHYs (Frequncy Shift Keying, Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing and Offset-Quadrature Phase Shift Keying) with numerous configurations, 2-FSK at 50 kbps is the mandatory and most prevalent radio setting used. This article looks at whether IEEE802.15.4g can be used to provide connectivity for outdoor deployments. We conduct range measurements using the totality of the standard (all modulations with all further parametrization) in the 863.870 MHz band, within four scenarios which we believe cover most low-power wireless outdoor applications: line of sight, smart agriculture, urban canyon, and smart metering. We show that there are radio settings that outperform the 2-FSK at 50 kbps base setting in terms of range, throughput and reliability. Results show that highly reliable communications with data rates up to 800 kbps can be achieved in urban environments at 540 m between nodes, and the longest useful radio link is obtained at 779 m. We discuss how IEEE802.15.4g can be used for outdoor operation, and reduce the number of repeater nodes that need to be placed compared to a 2.4 GHz solution.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherSensors-
dc.relation.ispartofSensors, 2018, 18(10)-
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/s18103468-
dc.rightsCC BY-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/-
dc.subjectwireless sensor networken
dc.subjectenvironmental observationsen
dc.subjectIEEE802.15.4gen
dc.subjectsub-GHzen
dc.subjectrange measurementsen
dc.subjectxarxa de sensors sense filsca
dc.subjectred de sensores inalámbricoses
dc.subjectIEEE802.15.4ges
dc.subjectIEEE802.15.4gca
dc.subjectsub-GHzes
dc.subjectsub-GHzca
dc.subjectobservacions ambientalsca
dc.subjectobservaciones ambientaleses
dc.subjectrango de mediciónes
dc.subjectrang de mesuraca
dc.subject.lcshSensor networksen
dc.titleEvaluation of IEEE802.15.4g for environmental observations-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.subject.lemacXarxes de sensorsca
dc.subject.lcshesRedes de sensoreses
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/s18103468-
dc.gir.idAR/0000006545-
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Apareix a les col·leccions:Articles cientÍfics
Articles

Arxius per aquest ítem:
Arxiu Descripció MidaFormat 
IEEE.pdf6,45 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Veure/Obrir
Comparteix:
Exporta:
Consulta les estadístiques

Aquest ítem està subjecte a una llicència de Creative Commons Llicència Creative Commons Creative Commons