Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
http://hdl.handle.net/10609/99596
Título : | Improving the content validity of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool: a modified e-Delphi study |
Autoría: | Hong, Quan Nha Pluye, Pierre Fàbregues, Sergi Bartlett, Gillian Boardman, Felicity Cargo, Margaret Dagenais, Pierre Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Griffiths, Frances Nicolau, Belinda O'Cathain, Alicia Rousseau, Marie-Claude Vedel, Isabelle |
Citación : | Hong, Q.N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., Gagnon, M.-P., Griffiths, F., Nicolau, B., O'Cathain, A., Rousseau, M.-C. & Vedel, I. (2019). Improving the content validity of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool: a modified e-Delphi study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, (), 1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008 |
Resumen : | Objective: The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) was developed for critically appraising different study designs. This study aimed to improve the content validity of three of the five categories of studies in the MMAT by identifying relevant methodological criteria for appraising the quality of qualitative, survey, and mixed methods studies. Study Design and Setting: First, we performed a literature review to identify critical appraisal tools and extract methodological criteria. Second, we conducted a two-round modified e-Delphi technique. We asked three method-specific panels of experts to rate the relevance of each criterion on a five-point Likert scale. Results: A total of 383 criteria were extracted from 18 critical appraisal tools and a literature review on the quality of mixed methods studies, and 60 were retained. In the first and second rounds of the e-Delphi, 73 and 56 experts participated, respectively. Consensus was reached for six qualitative criteria, eight survey criteria, and seven mixed methods criteria. These results led to modifications of eight of the 11 MMAT (version 2011) criteria. Specifically, we reformulated two criteria, replaced four, and removed two. Moreover, we added six new criteria. Conclusion: Results of this study led to improve the content validity of this tool, revise it, and propose a new version (MMAT version 2018). |
Palabras clave : | Quality appraisal Delphi technique Systematic review Qualitative research Survey Mixed methods research |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008 |
Tipo de documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
Versión del documento: | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Fecha de publicación : | 21-mar-2019 |
Licencia de publicación: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Articles Articles cientÍfics |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Descripción | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
modified_eDelphiStudy.pdf | 818,36 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Comparte:
Los ítems del Repositorio están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.